Advancing Schweitzer's Philosophy: The Case for an Animal Protection Commission

The Schweitzer Institute wholeheartedly endorses the establishment of a Governmental Animal Protection Commission (APC) in the UK. To advance this vision, we are partnering with the Centre for Animals & Social Justice (CASJ) to launch the ‘APC Coalition’—a collaborative network uniting academics, lawyers, and policymakers dedicated to promoting stronger animal welfare governance. Inspired by Albert Schweitzer’s ethic of “reverence for life,” our coalition aims to translate ethical ideals into practical public policy and real improvements in animal protection systems.

We are convinced that creating an independent governmental Animal Protection Commission is a vital step towards comprehensive, effective animal welfare in the UK. The current regulatory landscape, with its variety of advisory bodies like the Animal Welfare Committee, Animal Sentience Committee, and Animal Health and Welfare Board for England, remains fragmented and lacks the decisive authority needed to address today’s complex animal welfare challenges. While these committees do important work, their advisory nature leaves them without the legislative and enforcement powers required for real change.

This lack of binding authority creates persistent gaps in animal welfare protection—particularly in areas such as industrial farming, where the policy response remains slow and inconsistent despite both expert advice and public concern. Variations in enforcement across local councils create a “postcode lottery”, and many regions still do not have dedicated animal welfare officers to address local needs.

The British public is clear in its support for stronger animal welfare protections, with opinion polls consistently showing that animal welfare is a high priority for voters. However, existing structures have not kept pace with this demand. Establishing an APC would address this shortfall by creating a statutory body responsible for developing, implementing, and enforcing comprehensive welfare standards across the country.

It is important to acknowledge the likely challenges. Industries subject to new regulation may have concerns over increased scrutiny or stricter compliance requirements. Achieving the right balance between economic interests and ethical responsibility will require open dialogue and cooperation with all stakeholders. Securing the necessary resources and funds for an effective APC will also demand firm political commitment.

Nevertheless, the potential benefits are substantial. For animals, an APC means more consistent protection and better standards in all settings—farms, laboratories, and homes. For society, it provides a publicly accountable institution that can restore confidence, enhance environmental sustainability, and improve public health through rigorous welfare and food standards. Internationally, the APC would underline Britain’s position as a leader in animal protection and help to inspire further progress around the world. Most importantly, it would signal a genuine commitment to the ethical treatment of animals—one that reflects both evolving societal values and Schweitzer’s enduring philosophy.

While there are real obstacles to overcome, the case for an Animal Protection Commission is compelling and urgent. By unifying oversight and enforcement under a single, well-resourced authority, the UK can once more set the standard for humane and effective animal protection. This is an essential step, not only for the wellbeing of animals in our care, but for the advancement of compassion, responsibility, and ethical progress across our society.

For more detail and evidence supporting this proposal, please download the paper below.